My wife gets upset when I post my life journals. In my case, I would threaten to post it and take money not to.

But - we already know your eccentric Po'
we have come to just accept it.

( Most of us would NEVER post a real picture of ourselves with you and Skinnit around anyway- we have all seen your handiwork and his )

I wouldn't have let it pass.. its past borderline.. even fully clothed, somethings should be censored for integrity's sake.

absolutely.

It has been made perfectly clear that WC is not a family site like everyone once thought. With that being the case, you cannot police taste. The picture may be a seed for sick people to ogle over but we can't be all high and mighty about it.

Worry about yourself and leave my/your likes and dislikes alone.   

 

I do hope you all never go to public pools.  I think your eyes may burn out of their sockets.  LOL

I looked at the screenshot again and I'm missing something.  No nudity, no "come hither" look, nothing but a woman in a pool.  Maybe I'm desensitized . . but while I see no artistic merit . . I don't see anything anything that warrents "some things should be censored for integrity's sake"

Lets just say.. I wouldnt let it on my site... thats all.

Its a bit.. in your face.   

Once again - its a matter of taste. I guess everyone Zooms in on the ass end of a person when taking a pic in a pool. I dont care if you remove it - leave it and give it a 5 star rating.

I asked about the WC Guidline rule " A Wall must be suffiently " OBSCURED "
Has that rule been tossed in the toilot ?

It would seem that my inital perception of the leadership of this site was highly overrated...and with that I will bid you a fond fair well.

How true.......

Perhaps the key words highlighted in BOLD black might help...just read those words.

The same goes here. I would really like assistance in getting all my work removed. This site is suppose to be for everyone and if one person is offended it should be respected and removed. I will not battle with desensitized people who think just because this is an adult site anyone can post any perversion they want and call it okay. I realize I am not the most popular person here, but there are some who have enjoyed my work. You will still be able to find it and Troys work at my site clwoods Gallery WWW Link and at Skinnalicious
WWW Link So long.

It's a valid and unarguable point that Fairry raises. A point valid enough for the shot to be removed by now without question.

Well ..I don't leave that easy...but its sad that it came to 2 members leaving over this matter. I believe they are leaving more because of the lack of support they received about this issue. This was blown out of proportion and it could of simply been resolved without all the comments that were meant to make the ones offended look petty and silly.

Once again ...READ comment 26 - I see PORN - SCHOOL GIRL LOOK - DEGRADE.

So if you think this was just an innocent pic of a Japanese model - your wrong.

This could of been removed simply for not following WC Guidelines for a wall not properly obscured. But I noticed that comment was skipped over twice. Ill ask again

"I asked about the WC Guidline rule " A Wall must be suffiently " OBSCURED "
Has that rule been tossed in the toilot ? "

While I don't find it offensive enough to merit leaving the site It does bother me that this sort of stuff is creeping in when i go out of my way to avoid it on other sites.

And the girl looks and is intended to look 14.